Wednesday, July 30, 2008

The Dark Knight


July 30, 2008

The Dark Knight (2008) *****

Directed by Christopher Nolan

The Dark Knight may very well be on its way to becoming the second biggest blockbuster in movie history just short of Titanic. It even has a chance of surpassing Titanic’s all-time box office achievement, but unless its weekly declines are astonishingly slow, its chance to be number one is slim. That being said, for me, seeing The Dark Knight was such an awesome experience that I’m reminded of Titanic from ten years ago—a film that I consider to be one of the three best movies ever made, and it still stands alone as the most entertaining film I’ve ever seen. The Dark Knight isn’t in the same league as Titanic in any way except for the thrills that it delivers. Never have I seen a film in my adult life that was so almost exhaustively riveting. I’m not sure if I’ve used the word riveting anywhere else in my reviews, but if I did, then I regret it. Riveting feels like it was destined to be withheld so that it can deservedly be ascribed to Christopher Nolan’s epic superhero masterpiece. The Dark Knight is the best superhero movie I’ve ever seen, and more than any other film ever, even Titanic, I believe that The Dark Knight lives up to its near mythic hype.

You might read that paragraph and think me a huge Batman geek. Quite the opposite is true. I’ve never seen Batman Begins, and I’ve only seen one other Batman movie in the theaters—the one with Jim Carrey, and I saw it only because someone I was friends with wanted to see it. I think Val Kilmer was in that one. I’m sure I’ve seen the 80’s version with Jack Nicholson as the Joker, but I don’t remember much about it. So, I really couldn’t care less that The Dark Knight was about to open. Granted, I was interested in the film because it was one of Heath Ledger’s last performances, and the buzz about Ledger as the Joker was quite impressive. So, I probably was thinking I’d eventually check it out, most likely on DVD.

But then the reviews started naming The Dark Knight as one of the year’s best films. Box office record after box office record were decimated, and the feedback surrounding Ledger as the Joker was way beyond anything I anticipated. Still, though, it took my favorite podcast, Filmspotting, doing a spoiler edition of The Dark Knight to get me to finally go out and see it. I need my Filmspotting, and I couldn’t go a whole week without listening.

Within the first fifteen minutes, I felt as if something invisible grabbed me hard by the throat and never did its grip release until the final credits. Seriously, I know that I can exaggerate, but I’ve never had the experience before of being so completely, well, RIVETED! The film’s tone is brutal, and its violence is surprisingly vicious for a PG-13 movie. There’s one scene involving a pencil that still has me creeped out, and yet, nothing graphic was shown. Another scene involves the Joker slicing the corners of the mouth of a character, and while the actual act wasn’t shown on screen, I felt unbelievably uncomfortable because the film let me fill in the blanks in my head. I assure you that my mental images are worse than anything they could have shown even if the film had been rated R.

From the very beginning, The Dark Knight pushed my comfort level to its very limit. I have read that some people have found the film’s tone to be sadistic and unpleasantly cruel. While I disagree, I certainly understand where those people are coming from. For me, I was unsettled just enough to allow me to recall the film as a whole with pleasure and satisfaction. You may want to keep in mind that for some, The Dark Knight has the potential to be a depressing cinematic experience. For most, though, it’s a nightmare of a good time!

Interestingly enough, one of the things I was thinking during the 150 minute plus running time was that Christopher Nolan didn’t make this movie for someone like me. I’m not really a popcorn movie watcher. I don’t want to go to the movies to be passive. Instead, I want a film to engage me and hopefully challenge me as well. Things blowing up, graphic bloodshed and copious amounts of exposed flesh aren’t enough to win me over. Also, I’m not at all a Batman fan, or for that matter, a superhero movie fan.

Director Christopher Nolan, who co-wrote the screenplay with his brother Jonathan, made The Dark Knight to please the film’s established fan base. There was a point in the movie where I would have been totally fine if the film ended. Actually, I really expected it to end just then, but instead there was another hour to go, which included surprise after surprise, climax after climax. Characters we thought were dead weren’t, and other characters we thought were good have a change of heart. Misdirection for misdirection’s sake can be very frustrating, but each and every time I was hit with a plot twist, the film delivered by allowing each narrative puzzle piece to serve its one unifying element regarding the battle of good versus evil.

The very end of the film wasn’t too surprising considering all of the twists that preceded it. Therefore, I actually found The Dark Knight’s conclusion to be its weakest aspect, though it was definitely satisfying. What really merits The Dark Knight its five star review are Nolan's direction, especially of the action sequences, and its superb cast which universally brought their A-game! Christian Bale does a fine job in an almost thankless role as Batman by way of Dean Martin, the straight man. Do I even need to talk about Heath Ledger? All I’ll say is that when they announce his name at the Oscars as the winner of Best Supporting Actor next February, I will definitely be applauding, even if I’m watching it by myself. What would really make my day Oscar-wise would be to have Aaron Eckhart also nominated as Best Supporting Actor. Ledger deserves to win, but Eckhart’s performance as Harvey Dent deserves serious recognition, and I think an Oscar nomination would do the trick nicely.

The Dark Knight isn’t a perfect film. The make-up job regarding a burned character is almost laugh out loud funny. An outside make-up artist should have been allowed in so that he or she could scream the words, “YOU’VE GONE WAY TOO FAR AND NOW IT LOOKS STUPID!” At times during the final few action scenes, I was relying a bit too much on sound effects to tell me that there’s fighting going on. A mixture of frenetic camera switches and dark lighting made some fights impossible to follow in detail. That being said, a film trying this hard to entertain absolutely earns the right to have its flaws forgiven.

Not since Titanic have I seen a movie so worth the money it costs to buy a ticket. I would have been satisfied with a running time of 90 minutes, but Nolan wasn’t thinking about me. He was thinking about those college kids dressed up like Batman at midnight on the morning of its premier. He wanted to make them proud, and judging by the fact that The Dark Knight is now the number one rated movie of all time on the Internet Movie Database, he succeeded and then some. To be honest, I almost feel like an outsider privileged to go along on an amazing ride which was created specifically to make die-hards happy!

9 comments:

Mad Hatter said...

Batman was one of my childhood heroes. I watched the 1960’s show (with Adam West as Batman) and had a Batman Halloween costume. I loved the way he used ingenuity, intelligence, and gadgets to defeat villains. I also liked his puns…. Some of my favorite parts of The Dark Knight are the parts where Batman similarly uses ingenuity and gadgets to fight the Joker. I especially enjoyed the chase scenes. On the other hand, I don’t think anyone died in the 1960’s show, whereas The Dark Knight contains brutal violence. I was glad the movie was not bloody or gory, but I winced at the implied violence and covered my eyes to avoid looking at the burned character. As far as the acting goes, Heath Ledger’s performance really stands out. He is so expressive. His Joker is complicated, creepy, devious, heartless, intelligent and full of surprises. I agree with Brian that this movie is riveting and needs to be seen in a theater. Loud rumbles often shook the theater, making me feel like I was right there at the scene.

i'm pretty sure you can guess by this point said...

You said that you expected Ledger to get an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. Would his role be considered large enough to get him nominated for Best Actor? He had more screen time than other Best Actor winners have had.

Brian Dunn said...

I'm almost positive that Ledger will be considered in the Supporting Actor category. Technically, the movie studio can choose which category to submit their actors, but if they submit a supporting performance for a lead, it would probably be more difficult to win if up against performances with more screen time.

That being said, you're right about performances nominated in the lead category which probably should have been considered for supporting. I haven't seen it, but I understand that Forest Whitaker in Last King of Scotland has significantly less screen time than James McAvoy but Whitaker still won the Best Actor Oscar.

Surprisingly, Ledger's actually not in very much of the Dark Knight. People probably remember his character so vividly that they remember him on screen more than he is. He's probably in the film for less than 40 minutes. Anyway, Ledger has a better chance of winning Supporting Actor so I'd bet quite a bit of money that he will be nominated in that category.

Thanks for the post!

#1 Student! said...

Do you think this film will follow in the footsteps of Return of the King and get a nomination for Best Picture as a genre film?

Brian Dunn said...

I think whether or not it gets a nomination is totally up in the air. It's definitely possible, and it may even be probable. It depends on a few factors. First of all, will five other films carry enough buzz to knock it out? Second, will The Dark Knight carry much buzz at all? It's going to be re-released in theaters in December in order to strengthen its chances of nominations.

At this point, I think that it will receive a nomination for best picture. That being said, there's NO CHANCE AT ALL that it will win. None.

By the way, a lot of all of this depends on Golden Globe nominations. If it doesn't receive a nomination for a Globe, then it definitely won't receive an Oscar nod.

Ledger is still the clear favorite for Supporting Actor at this point.

john wilkes booth said...

As long as we're on the subject... What other movies that you've seen do you expect to get some Oscar nominations? Do you think that a movie like Paranoid Park will get nominations for...anything? Correct me if I'm wrong, but so far I think you're thinking In Bruges, The Dark Knight, and The Duchess. Are there any other movies that have already been released that you're thinking of?

Brian Dunn said...

I don't think Paranoid Park will be nominated for anything. I think The Duchess may receive nominations for things like costume design, art direction and Best Actress for Keira Knightly. I think most of the films that will receive nominations for Best Picture have yet to be released. I don't think In Bruges will receive any nominations at all.

I believe Richard Jenkins will receive a Best Actor nom for The Visitor. I think Penelope Cruz will receive a Best Supporting Actress nom for Vicky Cristina Barcelona. I also think Woody Allen will receive a Screenplay nod for that film as well.

By December, I will post my early choices for Oscar Nominations in all the major categories.

Thanks for the comment!

forkfanfiftyfive said...

Sorry it takes me a while to respond; there are no notifications so I have to remember to look at posts on which I have commented.

From your post on “In Bruges:”
“I absolutely believe he deserves an Oscar nomination for Best Actor giving a frantic, funny, and perplexing performance which carries the entire film. Brendan Gleeson also gives an Oscar worthy performance, albeit much more low-key than Ferrell’s, playing Ken, a character much more settled in his life of crime, though obviously caring a great deal about Ray, who is very new to being a hit man.
I hope voters remember this February released film when the time comes to fill in their Oscar ballots.”

Brian Dunn said...

Yeah, but just because they deserve a nomination doesn't mean they will get one.

In Bruges has no Oscar buzz at all so I doubt this film will be nominated for anything.

Its best chance at a nomination would be for screenplay.

At this point, some films to look out for Best Picture Nominations would be

Frost/Nixon
Revolutionary Road
Gran Turino
Milk
The Dark Knight
Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Proof
Che
The Reader

There are some others that might gain some buzz in the next two months, but I'd look for many of the nominations from these nine.