Saturday, August 7, 2010

Life During Wartime

August 7, 2010

Life During Wartime (2010) ***1/2
Directed by Todd Solondz

My tweet:

Life During Wartime (2010)- Though a bit busy & too tethered to the logic of Happiness, this is an interesting look at guilt. ***1/2 of 5

Other thoughts:

Todd Solondz's Happiness and Welcome to the Dollhouse were pivotal films for me as someone who has developed into a self-proclaimed film buff. At around 18 years old, I was drawn to the sorts of films that explore the dark side of the human condition with humor. Happiness, especially, was so funny to me even though it depicted unflinching depravity with the hardest scenes to stomach involving young children. Back then, I thought I was that much cooler because I liked Happiness; now, I appreciate it a bit more from an arm's length, and I would never actually recommend the film to anyone considering its subject matter. That being said, though I haven't watched Happiness in ten years, I remember the film vividly, and it truly is a masterpiece.

Life During Wartime is a re-imagined sequel to Happiness with many of the same characters played by different actors. Happiness' cast consisted of Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jane Adams, Dylan Baker, Jon Lovitz, Lara Flynn Boyle and Cynthia Stevenson. Their roles are played in Life During Wartime by Michael K. Williams, Shirley Henderson, Ciaran Hinds, Paul Reubens, Ally Sheedy and Allison Janney. Happiness focused on broken people's searches for fulfillment in a very broken world, while Life During Wartime explores guilt and the complexities of whether it's possible to forgive and/or forget. Even though Happiness is a much more shocking movie, Life During Wartime is the sadder film because from the beginning the viewer knows the futility of any character's quest for self-improvement. In a Solondz universe, there's nowhere to go but down.

At the center of the divergent plots are a divorce, a suicide, a pedophile's release from prison and a young boy not quite ready to become a man. All the melodrama exists within a heightened world where everyone speaks and reacts just a little too deliberately. At times, we enter into characters' dreams, fantasies and hallucinations only to find that what's going on in the mind is just as bad as what's going on in the real world.

Allison Janney's Trish Maplewood jumps all-too-quickly into a relationship with a married older man. There's a definite sense that she could do better, but after the betrayal and guilt she must have felt after learning of her ex-husband's pedophilia, her sense of self-worth is clearly damaged. On top of that, she's told her two younger children that their father is dead, because in a sense, he is dead to them. This all becomes problematic when her thirteen year old son, who's about to celebrate his bar mitzvah, learns the truth about his father. He's focused on whether or not it's possible to forgive and forget, considering the ramifications of his father's actions. The boy equates pedophilia with terrorism in this time of war, and considering how we're living in a country that's not forgiving and forgetting 9/11, how can he possibly come to terms with the sins of his father?

Meanwhile, Trish's college aged son, who's become quite the pot smoker, finds his father Bill at his dorm. He seems willing to talk things through, but Bill's own reticence to ask forgiveness gets in the way of either of them moving forward. Then there's Joy, a mousy woman who's on the precipice of an impending divorce from her drug and phone sex addicted husband Allen. She's not only dealing with the guilt of a broken marriage, but she's also literally haunted by the ghost of a former one-time blind date who killed himself because of her rejection.

I've heard it said that one doesn't really need to know Happiness to understand and appreciate Life During Wartime, but I find that hard to believe. Especially during each character's first scene, there are blatant reminders of who these people were and where they placed in Happiness' narrative. Unfortunately, this tethers everything into a world already established, and the result feels a little stifled. Had Solondz started fresh, Life During Wartime could have explored the same themes with much more focus and success. I suppose it's an accomplishment that he brought back these characters in interesting ways, but when it all comes down to it, Life During Wartime is simply a gimmick, and I do feel its success suffers a bit because of Solondz's indulgence.

The final scene involves Trish's son at his bar mitzvah talking to Trish's boyfriend after a previous altercation which stemmed from an odd misunderstanding. His speech perfectly captures the logical inconsistencies of our modern society's understanding of absolute good and evil. In the background, we see a character walk across the screen and then disappear into nothingness. Solondz presents a funny but brutally damning condemnation of what these unhealthy expectations can do to people trying to navigate an all too lethal terrain. When adults have no idea what they're doing, what hope does a boy becoming a man have for success, especially with the father he has--or doesn't have for that matter?

Sunday, August 1, 2010

Green Zone

August 1, 2010

Green Zone (2010) **
Directed by Paul Greengrass

My tweet:

Green Zone (2010)- Greengrass' direction is slick, but a comment on Iraq through an action flick? Stupid idea, stupid film. ** out of 5

Other thoughts:

What a total miscalculation! Perhaps one of the best directors working today, who made one of the greatest films of the decade, United 93, which itself will probably become a valuable historical artifact, decides to criticize the lies and falsities that the U.S. government sold to the American people, which entrenched us in a brutal, long war in Iraq causing thousands of American military casualties, through a popcorn action thriller that couldn't be more trite and simplistic regarding the motivations of the antagonists. According to Green Zone, the war in Iraq is really the fault of a mid-level government official working with a Wall Street Journal reporter to deceive the U.S. government into believing that there is a WMD program in place by Saddam Hussein's government.

I can't imagine anyone satisfied with the political machinations of this film. Those on the right who support the war will call Green Zone petty, and those on the left will say that it trivializes the Bush administration's massive deception. This film would be comparable to someone saying that Hitler's cook lied to him so much about Jews that it made him into an anti-Semite.

Greengrass has some compelling action sequences using handheld camerawork masterfully, as we've come to expect from his previous work. Damon is solid as ever, and the supporting cast does nothing worthy of blame, except maybe signing onto this inane project in the first place. The plot is dull and at times ludicrous (Damon's character is able to uncover the most damning state secrets ever by reading the Wall Street Journal's webpage after doing a Google search), and the climactic action scene is reminiscent of a first-person shooter game from Nintendo 64.

Though for the most part, Green Zone's direction is slick, this film is a worthless abomination. So many have been killed because of the lies of an administration, and this fact shouldn't be watered down for a standard Hollywood blockbuster. People avoided the movie when it came out in theaters, and good for them.

The Kids Are All Right

July 31, 2010

The Kids Are All Right (2010) ****
Directed by Lisa Cholodenko

My tweet:

The Kids Are All Right
(2010)- Great performances in an astute look at the complexities of marriage. **** out of 5


Other thoughts:

The title The Kids Are All Right is an interesting one considering that much of this family comedy/drama involves pretty significant conflicts among its characters. Yet, there's never a moment when we don't believe 15 year old Laser (Josh Hutcherson) and 18 year old Joni (Mia Wasikowska) are loved and will ultimately succeed in life. It's the marriage/partnership of their lesbian parents Nic and Jules (Annette Bening and Julianne Moore) that might not survive both the external and internal conflicts at play.

Laser convinces Joni to contact their sperm-donor father Paul (Mark Ruffalo), which she does without telling their moms about it. After an understandably awkward first meeting, the kids take to their biological dad, and Paul finds that a family might just be what he's looking for as well. When Nic and Jules find out about Paul, they react very differently. Jules takes to him right away considering that she's a bit of a wandering soul, and he's a hippie who's found success in life. Paul asks Jules to landscape his backyard, which is great for Jules since she just started this business after many previous failed attempts at employment. Nic, on the other hand, is a type-A controller, and she's spent her life taking an unconventional family and shaping it into something that looks so perfect on the outside. Thus, she finds the addition of a man into her kids' lives something which she doesn't want and she cannot control.

Even before the kids meet Paul, Nic and Jules are having some relationship difficulties. Their physical relationship has turned pretty stale, and Nic has taken to drinking pretty heavily. Jules acts out in her own surprising way which I won't spoil, but they are tested to the extreme. With Joni going away to college and with the conflicts that arise because of Paul, the moms' relationship perhaps might not be able to survive. Then again, the title does suggest that the kids are going to be all right. If they're going to stay together, they're going to have to stay together for each other.

The performances are truly wonderful all around. Annette Bening especially deserves serious Oscar buzz for walking such a difficult line between unpleasant automaton and loving wife and mother. Nic wears her frustrations on her sleeve, and Bening not only translates Nic's insecurities perfectly, but she makes this woman ultimately someone to be admired and even liked. Julianne Moore has the more direct, compartmentalized role, playing a bubbly, spacey woman trying to find herself at this crossroads in her life. Moore is great and truly fun to watch, though most of her performance requires less nuance. Mark Ruffalo gives perhaps his best performance as Paul, the most seemingly mellow and entrancing man in the world. We've got to believe that the kids are going to take to Paul pretty quickly, and Ruffalo brings the charm and magnetism so well. He's also the funniest person in a film with quite a lot of comedy.

Unfortunately, the kids, who are featured prominently at the beginning only to be pretty much forgotten about in the middle until they reappear again for a final few scenes, aren't as fleshed out as the adults. That's nothing against the performances by Hutcherson and Wasikowska who are both excellent. Laser, especially, has a subplot involving an idiot of a friend which goes nowhere. If it wasn't for Laser's desire to meet Paul, there would be no film. It's too bad that he's set up really well only to be pushed aside when he's no longer needed.

Lisa Cholodenko succeeds in delivering a sexy comedy about an unconventional couple trying to live as a conventional family until an x-factor pulls at the threads. Unlike modest movies about families and relationships like Cyrus and Please Give, The Kids Are All Right feels real in so many ways, from its characterization, to its comedy, to its conflicts, to its ultimate resolution.

I'm tempted to end this review with something like, "The Kids Are All Right is all right," but I won't because, first of all, that's pretty corny, and second, this movie is better than all right. It's very good.